Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study

From: Anastomosis selection in liver transplantation for recipients with unusable recipient hepatic arteries: a bayesian network meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Study

Recipient Artery

Number of Patients

Age (Mean)

Sex (Male)

Follow-up (months)

Beaurepaire et al. [7]

2022

France

Retrospective

SA

26

58

16

70

CT

12

56.5

9

32

AO

91

52

59

62

HA

1395

57

1079

61

Alim et al. [12]

2021

Turkey

Prospective

SA

16

49

NA

42

GA

6

34

NA

42

AO

649

51

NA

42

Llado et al. [13]

2019

Spain

Prospective

HA

1405

53

959

24

SA

54

49

32

24

Rhu et al. [14]

2019

South Korea

Retrospective

HA

765

53

598

48

GA

35

54

25

48

Kazemi et al. [15]

2017

Iran

Retrospective

SA

17

32

4

12

AO

76

39

41

12

Dokmak et al. [16]

2015

France

Prospective

CT

7

48

2

15

SA

2

48

2

24

AO

2

50

2

24

Hibi et al. [4]

2013

USA

Retrospective

AO

267

54

165

89

HA

1112

53

744

89

Cappadonna et al. [17]

2001

USA

Prospective

AO

37

47

21

32

HA

168

49

90

38

Uchiyama et al. [18]

2010

Japan

Prospective

HA

313

51

152

12

GA

22

51

7

12

Nikitin et al. [19]

2008

USA

Retrospective

AO

149

50

NA

240

HA

2197

50

NA

240

Del Gaudio et al. [20]

2005

Italy

Retrospective

HA

313

51

152

12

AO

22

51

7

12

Ullah et al. [21]

2003

Pakistan

Prospective

SA

512

48

67

42

HA

101

46

355

39

Figueras et al. [22]

1997

Spain

Prospective

SA

23

NA

NA

18

AO

12

NA

NA

18

  1. Abbreviations: CT, Celiac trunk; SA, Splenic artery; HA, Hepatic artery; AO, Aortic artery; GA, Branches of gastric artery; NA, not available